There are two competing foundational worldviews; each one
containing radically different end results.
One worldview, the naturalist/humanist/secular worldview,
tells us that we came into being by accident (not guided by intelligence), that
the only purpose we have is the purpose we give ourselves, and that we are
responsible to no higher being or cause.
The competing worldview, the Biblical worldview, claims that
humans were created by God, for His purposes, and that we are accountable to
Him. This worldview tells us that we
have failed to live as God required, thus incurring His judgment, but that He
has also provided the way whereby we may be reconciled to Him.
The naturalistic camp believes that science has proven their
viewpoint to be true; however, they still have no explanation for our existence
except to believe that “it just happened”…no rhyme, no reason…just a cosmic
accident that somehow (without intelligent guidance) organized itself into
everything we see today. This theory requires
faith in the proposition that ‘nothing arranged itself over millions (perhaps
billions) of years into the incredibly complex universe existing today’.
Those who believe a Biblical worldview see the evidence of
intelligence all around us. The
intricacies of the flower and the eyeball offer clear testimony of design. The idea of everything simply ‘evolving’ and
‘improving’ (especially when science actually tells us that our universe is
headed the opposite direction; becoming increasingly disorganized and chaotic)
into the universe in which we now live stretches the very bounds of cognitive
activity let alone common sense.
Make no mistake; each of these worldviews requires
‘faith’. One either places that ‘faith’
in an all-powerful and wise Creator God as being responsible for our existence,
and to whom we are ultimately accountable, or our ‘faith’ is place in random accidental
occurrences governed by nothing (or governed by the “laws of physics” which
came about by those same random accidental occurrences), with no purpose,
headed nowhere.
The Bible tells us that the end result of a life lived
according to each of these worldviews is radically different. The naturalist/humanist/secular viewpoint is
described as a gate that is, “…wide and the way is broad that leads to
destruction, and there are many who enter through it” (Matthew 7:13). The Biblical worldview is portrayed as a gate
that is, “…small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few
who find it” (Matthew 7:14). So, in
essence, what we are confronted with is the choice between ‘destruction’ and
‘life’. When seen in this way, does
anyone truly desire ‘destruction’?
God has given each of us the responsibility, and ability,
and opportunity to choose which worldview we will adopt. He loves each of us and wants us to have a
saving, loving relationship with Him; but, He leaves the decision up to us: we
can follow the wide gate that leads to destruction or we can follow the narrow
gate (by trusting in Jesus Christ and living for Him) that leads to life now
and for eternity.
As Moses told the Israelite people after explaining the
inevitability of this choice, “I call heaven and earth to witness against you
today, that I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse.
So choose life in order that you may live, you and your descendants, by loving
the Lord your God, by obeying His voice, and by holding fast to Him…”
(Deuteronomy 30:19-20 NASB).
There is no more serious decision to be made.
Resources:
New American Standard Bible
No comments:
Post a Comment